Tuesday, June 24, 2008

School closure vote

Lionel closure
FORAGAINSTABSENT
Morag Munro (Chair)
Catriona Stewart (Vice-Chair)
David Blaney
Archie CampbellAnnie MacDonaldMurdo MacLeod
ConvenorDonald NicholsonMary Bell Galbraith
Norman MacLeodCharlie Nicolson
Vice ConvenorKenny MacIver
Angus MacCormackIain Morrison
Roddy MacKayAgnes Rennie
Rev MartinRev Campbell

Shawbost closure

FORAGAINSTABSENT
Morag Munro (Chair)
Catriona Stewart (Vice-Chair)
David Blaney
Archie CampbellAnnie MacDonaldMurdo MacLeod
Convenor
Mary Bell Galbraith
Norman MacLeodCharlie NicolsonRev Martin
Vice ConvenorKenny MacIver
Angus MacCormackIain Morrison
Roddy MacKayAgnes Rennie
Donald NicholsonRev Campbell

*although Rev Coghill had returned just in time to vote he declined to do so as he had not heard the debate

Back closure

FORAGAINSTABSENT
Morag Munro (Chair)
Catriona Stewart (Vice-Chair)
David Blaney
Archie CampbellAnnie MacDonaldMurdo MacLeod
ConvenorCharlie NicolsonMary Bell Galbraith
Norman MacLeodKenny MacIverRev Martin
Vice ConvenorIain Morrison
Angus MacCormackAgnes Rennie
Roddy MacKayRev Campbell
Donald NicholsonRev Coghill


----

Thanks to a very reliable source, and apologies for the lack of formatting.

19 comments:

  1. Anonymous12:49 pm

    Rev Martin, Rev Campbell, Rev Coghill?

    It is obscene that religious extremists, unelected by residents and taxpayers, can excert such influence on policy here. Especially in tight vote situations such as these. Because someone wears a dog collar and professes to believe in a particular type of ghost, they get to decide crucial local matters such as which school stays open and which closes?

    What other part of the modern world lets itself be run by a splinter group of extremists and fundamentalists? 21st century? Don't make me laugh; it's a sick, pathetic, backwards, embarassing and unfunny joke.

    If this is how major policy is decided, perhaps the Western Isles and the residents who live on them do not deserve to prosper after all.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous2:14 pm

    Am I to guess your not Free Church
    12.49?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous2:59 pm

    how many of the against mob voted to keep Bayble open. Not the "BBC I am only ther for the money Maciver" or the Vice Chair. No backbone to vote with their brain.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous3:17 pm

    John McCririck at 12.49 I heard you debating with Rev Hargreaves on Radio 2 on Monday with all your bigotry

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous11:36 pm

    3.17, it doesn't take a bigot to recognise that for the unelected to hold what could be a deciding vote on important matters (actually any matters) and for there not to be a deafening outcry against it is indeed shockingly, disgracefully, shamefully backwards.

    I agree, we don't deserve to prosper, if we think this is acceptable in the 21st century.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous8:52 am

    'What other part of the modern world lets itself be run by a splinter group of extremists and fundamentalists?' 12:49.

    The UK does - The House of Lords.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous10:33 am

    anon 12.49

    Couldn't agree more - I knew that Coghill (that rational voice of reason!) was involved, but I didn't know he had another two of his cult bretheren with him. This is ridiculous.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous11:37 am

    well said 8:52

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous2:10 pm

    Can someone enlighten me - besides the education committee and (I think?) the licencing committee, is there anything else the churches have a vote on?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Only Councillors sit on the Licencing Board, but they have a statutory right to be consulted on licencing applications.

    As far as I know, they influence no committees other than Education & Children's Services.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous2:50 pm

    > As far as I know, they influence no
    > committees other than Education &
    > Children's Services.

    Brainwash them whilst they're young.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous3:10 pm

    thanks Angus

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous9:01 pm

    So who sits on the children and education committee to represent the minorities? Muslims, Jews, Catholics, Atheists (strike me down with thunder) or do they have to rely on their elected to do what is right for them?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous10:10 pm

    As a catholic and an atheist (guilty but defiant), I'll say now that I waive any right I might be getting to be represented by any unelected person whatsoever.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous10:14 pm

    Tip of the week folks.

    Move to Lionel. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anonymous8:17 am

    Anon 10.10 PM. Can you tell us how you can be both a catholic and an atheist.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous11:53 am

    so, anon 12.49 only the relegious people can be extremists - try saying that in the soviet union, with a straight face! anon 2:50 Oh, yes of course they are going to be brainwashed by a school board - then they go home and watch children's programmes (I have yet to see a christian portrayed fairly on any - as for evangilisation don't make me laugh - and finally are any of you anons (mind you) brave enough to say similar things about Muslim or even hindi teachers?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anonymous1:01 pm

    11.53 - I don't see any Muslim or Hindi people deciding on the future of local schools merely because they are Muslim or Hindi. Do you?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anonymous11:19 am

    Fortunately for you, no, not in this country - otherwise you might have to make good on that. i am to understand that as a promise....?

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.