An intellectual writes.....
How much energy do we have?
A different kind of revolution
Goodbye, kind world
Correspondence with David Bellamy about the above article
and finally, a critique of David Bellamy's scientific knowledge
Junk science
Will MWT now disown David Bellamy as the bonkers, self-publicist that he obviously is?
2 comments:
Dear Angus,
I agree with much of what George Monbiot says about renewable energy and I’ve been taking a huge interest in the LWP proposal in general and stumbled across your web blog while working on an assignment for my Town Planning course. Personally, I oppose the LWP wind farm on the basis of its location in an important bird area and size but, like many people, I support renewable energy – I even like the look of wind farms. I also believe in human induced climate change. But I draw the line at destroying huge tracts of the peatlands; this, in my view, is more important than jobs or achieving x per cent of the UK’s renewable energy targets. Though I am against the development, I do of course wonder what the island would be like, economically, with it. As I come from Lewis, I know very well about the economic difficulties facing the Western Isles. If the Scottish Executive does grant permission (though I can see either a public inquiry or legal action looming) then I hope that the economic benefits do come true (and then some) but I will be hugely saddened by the devastation of the moor and its wildlife. I don’t think the two major wind farm developments per se and the attendant spin-off jobs will keep many young people on the island or provide an economic panacea. Like many, I left when I was eighteen and I would find it hard to return now. What I find interesting about the LWP development is how it makes us question our values, what we believe is good/bad, important etc. and that is a good thing.
Yours sincerely
This is exactly the kind of discussion we need to have, rather than the simple for or against. Like Fin(dlay?) I left at 18, and was very, very, lucky to get a job back here.
Values are there to be questioned, and whilst I have never claimed the proposals will be some form of global panacea, I do strongly believe that benefits outweigh the costs to the environment.
But, I may be wrong, and I recognise that. Such is the nature of politics.
Thanks for a constructive comment.
Post a Comment