RET (again!)
BUT, why should he have to lobby on an election promise? Is there some suggestion that RET isn't going to happen, or is being watered down? Or is it just that the 'study' actually kicking the issue into the long grass?
The blog formerly known as "Angus Nicolson - an incredulous eye on the isles" this was the blog of an ordinary, boring, former Councillor in the Western Isles of Scotland.
Angus is taking a sabbatical to be with his young family
Debate strengthens democracy, except inside the SNP, as he has discovered.
If you want balance then get some scales. This is opinion - our opinion.
Any proven errors of fact made will be corrected in the original article, or by publishing a correction at the same degree of prominence, or both. As far as practical, others who have quoted the article will be requested to make a note in their article - this would include, for example pinging back with the correction those who had linked to the original piece.
If articles are ever removed, a statement of why that has been done will be left in situ.
The rest is entirely at my discretion.
5 comments:
Perhaps if, as I hear, the Scottish Govt are going to proceed with the tender process which will, in all likelyhood, lead to Calmac Ferries Ltd. being awarded the contract to run ferries for the next 5 or 6 years then adjustments to fares can only be made when preparing tenders for the next contract to start in 2012 or 2013. This would mean that the next election campaign would have a promise of implementing the outcomes of the study done in the meantime (which will probably not be published in June 2011) leaving the islanders (all around Scotland - not just the Western Isles) having paid their full road tax (the same amount as anyone in the central belt) but still being held to ransom to access the trunk route network.
Ooooh you cynic! Are you suggesting that promises might not be kept, and that we may have been mislead when we voted SNP?
ABM and AA hung out to dry by their own party?
Promises are for election campaigns
Reality is for government
It was ever thus
Did anyone hear Donald Manford and DJ MacSween on the wireless the other day? I'm afraid I had a lie in that day but have been told they discussed RET. DM was in favour of some sort of ferry fare which reflected the cost of driving the equivalent distance. DJ wants all fares abolished as he sees them as tolls and the govt are in the process of doing away with tolls.
I have to agree with Donald Manford on this one because although you pay a bridge toll you still have to drive the distance to other end of the bridge. When you pay a ferry fare you park up and are taken the distance to the other end - no fuel used. no wear and tear. To abolish fares completely would be subsidising the travellers and Europe would not like that!
Couple of things;
Firstly the executive has no choice but to COMPLETE the tender process once it has started the current executive didn't start the tender process but they DO have to complete it.
Secondly, given the cost of improving and maintaining roads across the Hebrides I think that the combined road taxes of the Hebrides probably wouldn't even cover the maintenance costs on the roads we do have never mind the rolling upgrade programme which is going on along the spinal route.
5penny - since when has it been cynical to suggest promises might not be kept-it is run of the mill now!
Post a Comment