Say one thing, and do another...
"It is certainly very clear that reform of MPs' expenses is required," [Angus MacNeil] said.According to the voting record
"Westminster need to follow the lead of the Scottish Parliament who has managed to show transparency with regards expenses. Once again, Scotland leads the way!"
Date | Subject | Agreement with policy |
20 Apr 2007 | Freedom of Information (Amendment) Bill — Keep disclosure for MPs' expenses — rejected | absent |
20 Apr 2007 | Freedom of Information (Amendment) Bill — Exempt only correspondence — rejected | absent |
18 May 2007 | Freedom of Information (Amendment) Bill — That the Question now be proposed | absent |
18 May 2007 | Freedom of Information (Amendment) Bill — Continue to disclose MPs' correspondence — rejected | absent |
18 May 2007 | Freedom of Information (Amendment) Bill — Exempt constituents' letters only — rejected | absent |
18 May 2007 | Freedom of Information (Amendment) Bill — Third Reading — Closure | absent |
18 May 2007 | Freedom of Information (Amendment) Bill — Third Reading | absent |
3 Jul 2008 | MPs' allowances — External audits and no more furniture — rejected | absent |
30 Apr 2009 | MPs' financial interests — Full and complete registration | absent |
30 Apr 2009 | MPs' expenses — No lower limit for declaration | absent |
Perhaps expenses reform was also a "Low priority" for him.
2 comments:
At least we know Macsween reads your blog, after reading his report slagging Macneil on the Hebridean news it almost makes him look intelligent. Lazy git!
Read the article in the Gazette and try not to kick the cat.
Then have a go at the on-line poll asking if Mr Barra Buoy's expenses are kosher.
Post a Comment